‘Throwback’ of 71 years

As in every year, while I get ready to celebrate the Independence Day, the most pertinent question resurfaces in my mind. Have we, as a nation, done justice to the struggle of our freedom fighters? Have we, as a nation, stood on the promise that we made to each other? A promise to build a sovereign, socialistic, secular and democratic nation. Or are we just enjoying the powerful weapons loaded in our constitution – Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity?

While Nehru gave his famous speech “Tryst with Destiny”, he would have never expected our thirst with traditions. At the time of partition, lakhs of people were brutally butchered in the name of religion. Communalism was at its peaks causing an irreparable damage to our diverse heritage. Moreover, social evils such as untouchability, sati, caste discrimination, child marriage, female infanticide were deeply rooted in the society. The economic status was also dire. The literacy rate in India was just around 18% during Independence. Income of an average Indian was approximately Rs.1500 per year and average lifespan used to be 41 years. Nevertheless, India has achieved tremendous progress in most of the metrics.

While drafting the constitution, Ambedkar made sure that no one is left behind in our progress. Sardar Vallabhai Patel’s effort led to the unity of the entire country. Nehru was successful in blending modern education and technology with Indian culture. Vinoba Bhave was successful in redistributing thousands of acres of land to minimize inequality. With the solid seeds sown, the national building has begun.

Socially, we have come along a long way. Evil practices such as Untouchability and Sati are extinct. Female foeticide and infant mortality have been improved. Women empowerment is on the cards. Stringent laws preventing male hegemony, ruthless crimes and gender discrimination are in place. Article 29 of the constitution, guarantees protection and promotion of our rich and diverse culture. However, the caste discrimination and dowry system still prevail. Strong resistance ought to be offered to prevent the same.

Politically, we can be undoubtedly pound of ourselves. Right from the first day, we gave ourselves universal adult suffrage. Women in the USA and UK enjoyed voting rights only in the 1920s, many decades after their independence. Till date, we have conducted 16 massive LokSabha elections. Compared to our neighbours, we are far superior in maintaining democratic principles. One neighbouring government needs the military to stay in power and in another, the government is used by the military to stay in power. We also withstood Emergency in 1975-77 which tested the very essence of democracy. Of course, only by 1993 we were able to add another level to our governance i.e., Local self-governance which began through 72nd and 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act. Though women are still under-represented in Parliament that is not the case with Panchayat level. 33% reservation for the women has already shown a great result. As of now, there are around 10 lakh women representatives in India at different levels of Panchayat.

There was a time when floods, contaminated diseases and droughts engulfed innocent lives. Once, in the 1960s, Indira Gandhi had to desperately accept USA conditions for shipment of food grains. Since then, we have become one of the largest producer and exporter of food grains. Green revolution and white revolution led by people such as M.S. Swaminathan and Verghese Kurein have saved millions of lives. Even the revolutions conceptualized by Karl Marx or Stalin could have never saved so many people in the entire history.

Not to forget the 4th Industrial Revolution we are presently living in. From a country which had to depend on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to come out of Balance of Payment crisis (1991), we have become Net loan provider to IMF and also were instrumental in beginning BRICS ecosystem. It took Gandhi one whole year to commute across the length and breadth of the country. Now, every middle-class person is aiming to travel by flight. Thanks to the sacrifice of Airline industry.

We as a nation also withstood brazen attacks from our neighbours. Though we lost to China in 1962, we were successful in defeating Pakistan in 1965. We also liberated Bangladesh from the shackles of Pakistan in 1971. Courageously countered the infringement at the Kargil in 1991. Throughout the history, we were forced into war but never proactive attacked any country. Indian soldiers work all across the world to maintain world peace. Be it be for England in World War I or let it be in Africa for UN Peacekeeping missions.

For a moment, if we stop wondering why SEC data was not released or on why Rahul Gandhi hugged Narendra Modi and forget about the entrenched corruption, social discrimination, gender inequalitiy, etc etc., India is a mere delight to live in. Just-

– To experience the diverse climates – from chilling cold in J&K to arid desert of Rajasthan

– To taste diverse varieties- from Andhra Tirupati laddu to Gujarat dhokla

– To enjoy the captivating dance performances – from Kathakali of Kerala to Bharata Natyam of Tamil Nadu

– To witness the rich tribal heritage of North East

-To cherish the rock-cut caves in Elora of Maharashtra and the Mughal paintings of North.

-To meet people believing in diverse philosophies and speaking in various languages.

-Or to just sit back and watch “Friends”

If taking a human form is a bliss, taking birth in this generation is a luck. Living in India is a celebration. One can never be bored of people or places.

Amidst all this enjoyment, did we forget about the promise made at the beginning?

Happy Independence Day.

Jai Hind.

~Shankar.

Spain poilitical crisis – Lessons for India

For the past one month, Nifty 50 was on a roller coaster ride. For someone arduously following the market, the reason is evident – the political crisis in Europe. Uncertainty in the politics of Spain and Italy is creeping into the nerves of the investors across the world. A decade after the world witnessed Eurozone crisis, the present scenario in Europe exemplifies its inability to return to a normal situation. The present political scenario is a fallout of decade-long unsustainable growth across Europe.

Madrid just ousted their Prime Minister, Mariano Rajoy, who suppressed the Catalonian separatists with an iron-fist. The newly formed government also lifted the direct rule on Catalonia. The policy of new Prime Minister, Mr. Pedro Sanchez, towards the separatists, is awaited. However, he is unlikely to budge for their demands. The reasons for all the political drama lies in the heart of Europe’s fledgling economy. According to Eurostat, after Eurozone crisis, the northern states have substantially recovered compared to their southern parts. The unemployment and poverty are pulling the economy backward making them non-competitive with respect to Germany or France.

Mr. Rajoy was partly successful in sustaining the growth at 3% for the past three years. He was also successful in maintaining the fiscal prudence given the huge government debt. However, he could not control the simmering anger in his country due to illegal migration and widespread unemployment. The impending reason for his ouster was the proven corruption charges on his political party. Mr. Rajoy himself testified against few of his party members which indirectly led to his ouster.

The BJP government in India has a lot to learn from above political situation. Indian GDP growth stood at 7.7% this quarter, surpassing all expectations. So, does the Spanish growth of 3%. Even the fiscal prudence was perfectly maintained by Indian government just as in Spain. However, both Spanish and Indian government failed to understand the impact of their policies on people. Spanish government took more prudent measures to contain their fiscal deficit. Indian government implemented GST and demonetisation without providing some cooling off period.

Also, BJP flexed its muscle way more than what is required in trying to form the government in Karnataka. So did Spanish government in dismissing the Catalonian government. After the recent by-poll election, BJP should understand that not all is in their favour and people sentiments are fast changing. BJP legislators are also lackadaisical in propagating the benefits of GST and other policies they have been implementing. Their approach in pacifying the minorities has also caused widespread resentment among their major vote bank. It’s time the government respects and understand people sentiment and rework on their policies. Otherwise, they will face the fate of recently ousted Spanish government.

-Shankar

Should we stop teaching our children to be honest ?

“He who is dishonest in small things will be dishonest in big things as well. If one cannot be trusted with the things of this world how can he be trusted with the things of the next?”  

I was invigilator in one of the halls in which the final term students of an MBA program were writing their exam. And even as the exam was going on, I took the liberty of writing these two lines on the classroom’s white board.

The purpose was to point out that it does not pay to be dishonest. It was to bring to the students’ notice that larger responsibilities cannot be reposed on someone who is dishonest. It was to say that dishonesty was not the path if one aspired for leadership.

After the exam was over I thought it was a good opportunity to get the entire batch to give some thought to this theme. So I mailed the same to the whole class along with the following questions to guide them in their reflections.

1. Is the first sentence an empirical observation or an opinion?

2. What are the implications of the same on:

a) Trust you will have in a friend, who you see is dishonest in small things, with very important things of your life… say family, children etc…

b)  Can a dishonest person be a genuine leader considering that true leadership has a core that is essentially spiritual?

3. “My dear Watson, I do believe that if I were to be a thief I would have been a very good one at that” —Sherlock Holmes

To be truthful I had an open mind. I had not thought it through and it was an opportunity for me as it would be for the students. If the students were able to pause a bit on the question and reflect, they could possibly re-visit their assumptions and everyone would be richer off it. The deeper and more honest the reflection the greater the benefit one would gain from it. So why not ask them to submit a write up of 200 words of their considered view on the subject? They were to write mostly on a voluntary basis. And whether they were aware or not aware of it, it was not linked to any kind of punishment for non-compliance.

I did not tell them that the quote was from Jesus Christ. And it being from Jesus Christ, I was more than sure that it was an empirical observation—realty as it is. Jesus Christ has not failed me in faith or wisdom over the years that I have been studying Him. I was trying to find what the students thought about the lines without bogging them down with dogma.

Diving into the issue:

I got a googly as the first response. A lady student shared the following URL.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/opinion/sunday/children-lying-intelligence.html

It was about a research finding and the title reads “Is Your Child Lying to You? That’s Good”

The author Alex Stone says: “…we try to instill this belief (honesty) in our children. Classic morality tales like “The Boy Who Cried Wolf” and “Pinocchio” speak to the dangers of dishonesty, and children who lie a lot, or who start lying at a young age, are often seen as developmentally abnormal, primed for trouble later in life.

But research suggests the opposite is true. Lying is not only normal; it’s also a sign of intelligence…”

Alex reports that in an experiment, designed by the developmental psychologist Michael Lewis in the mid-1980s, consistently lead to the conclusion that at least a third of 2-year-olds, half of 3-year-olds and 80 percent or more of children 4 and older will deny a transgression which they actually committed in the experimental setting, regardless of their gender, race or family’s religion.

It was also found that the Children were so remarkably good at lying that adults, including their parents, found it difficult to spot. Further, those who lied had higher verbal I.Q.s than those who did not, by as much as 10 points. The exception though were children who did not get induced into committing a transgression in the first place. They were the smartest of all, but a rarity.

Other pluses exhibited by these ‘liars’ included better “executive functioning skills” and a heightened ability to see the world through other people’s eyes. Further, young liars were found to be even more socially adept and well adjusted.

This immediately calls to mind the ancient Indian folklore of the Makhan Chor (butter thief). The young lord Krishna, with some of his friends make a human pyramid and feast on butter that is in a pot hung from the roof. When confronted, almost red handed, He denies.

So then, was Lord Krishna a liar? And if so, could he be trusted with things of the other world?  Are Lord Krishna and Jesus Christ, therefore, meaning different things?

Contradictory though the perspectives seem, the truth lies somewhere behind these. For both divine figures represent deep wisdom and great credibility.

One counter can be given right away: Psychologist have long known that the child does not distinguish between what it sees and what is its own as far as food and objects go. These matters of ownership are put into the head as children grow up.

It is another matter if, as the children grow up, there is an “agreement” that some action or activity should be considered taboo. In which case adherence or non-adherence to that “agreement” comes into question.

On this ‘agreement’ matter Alex throws some light, he comes up with a widely reported find that children as old as 16 are less likely to lie about their misdeeds and the misdeeds of others, after pledging to tell the truth.

Alex reports that psychologist Angela Evans has also found that if children promise not to transgress (peek at the toy when they have been asked not to while the researcher is out of the room) then they are less likely to. And it works even with children who don’t know the meaning of the word “promise.”

This last observation holds an interesting clue. The scientists were able to communicate the ‘feeling’ of the word ‘promise’ even though the children did not know its meaning. Without the word ‘promise’ acting as a via media to carry the meaning in the communication, how did the scientists manage to convey the meaning?

Scientists in the field of communication have established that word component of communication could be even lesser than 30% of a total interaction; the intonation, volume, gestures, expressions, posture, timing, accent, etc. account for the rest of the communication. That would explain why in Angela Evans’ experiment, the idea of ‘promise’ could be communicated to children even without their knowing the word’s meaning.

Considering that there is this other hidden 70%, one can only wonder what that total communication would have been when the scientists told the children not to peek. The verbal component of the communication said ‘don’t peek’. There is no contesting that… But if the non-verbal component of the communication was screaming ‘you little rascal, you will peek I’m sure’ then 70% to 30% they would most likely peek.

As for the communication to the infant Krishna, even if the words said to him were ‘Did you take the butter?’ What was the content of the non-verbal part? Was it ‘you are a thief’?

The response to the verbal part would have been yes (I did eat the butter), but to the non-verbal part, it would be a resounding ‘No!’ (I’m not a thief).

What is more important: saying ‘No! I am (is) not a thief’ or saying ‘Yes! I did take the butter’? So denial could mean the more important of these two… what indeed is more important, yes or no?

Recently I asked the mercurial Mr. TN Seshan, former Chief Election Commissioner of India this question: ‘Admiral Arun Prakash, former Chief of Naval Staff of India, (an articulate person himself), used to say that either a person is honest or he is dishonest, there are no shades of grey. What is your opinion of it?’

Mr. Seshan replied: “consider this. A poor man has met with a fatal accident in a company premises. He has left behind a poor wife with no means, who is also pregnant with their child. You are the manager who has to report the accident. The accident happened in one corner of the building. If you report that the accident happened in the shop floor the compensation would be huge. If you report that it happened in the corner of the room then the poor woman would get nothing. What do you do?” …..

Again this brings us to the contrasting views… is honesty a matter of black and white or shades of grey?

Consider this narration:

There was once a sage known for his honesty. He always told the truth and was sure he would go to heaven because he had maintained this all his life. One pleasant afternoon, while he was meditating in the forest in front of his hut, a man, breathless from running, chanced upon him. He was apparently running away from a band of thieves who were out to kill him. He pleaded to the saint, “kindly let me hide in your hut. Do not let them know that I am hiding here”. The sage allowed him and the man hid himself in the hut.

Soon enough the murderous mob with bloodied knives and spears reached the spot.

One of the thieves asked the saint. “A man came running this way, did he get into your hut?”

The saint was in a dilemma. If he said ‘yes’, it would be the truth but the man would die. If he said ‘no’ it would save the man’s life but his claim to heaven would be lost… The saint, faithful to what he believed was his highest purpose, said ‘yes he is inside’. The thieves dashed in, got the man and killed him.

Lord Krishna concludes this story by saying that the saint did not go to heaven because of this one incident….

Through this story Lord Krishna seems to be pointing out that one must not be driven by the categorical imperative of Kant (about not telling lies) but should rather go by the humanistic approach even though it would call for him to utter a lie.

But the story does not end here if this position is correct, is Jesus Christ wrong then?

In another place in the bible, a quotation attributed to Jesus Christ goes like this… (Matthew 6:24),

No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon”

That quote is from the King James Version of the Bible. The “New” version of the Bible translates ‘mammon’ as ‘money’. You cannot serve God and money it says.

Let’s put it this way: Each decision that we take in life can be tested for correctness in earthly matters as well as spiritual matters. When we put the combination of these in a two by two matrix we get four possibilities. Of which the advised imperative is to always choose the spiritual right.  In which case you ought to be disloyal to the earthly or monetary aspect if there is a conflict.

A pledge taken by someone to the effect that he will do so and so, is earthly commitment. If some time later, in a particular situation, humanism demands of him that he should go against that pledge, then he ought to be loyal to the spiritual impulse rather than to the material pledge. (best is don’t make a promise… if someone asks you say ‘yes’ or ‘no’ … Bible)

Therefore the categorical imperative is to be tied to the spiritual right always. (By implication: if you cannot fathom the call of the divine that is within you, if you cannot hear the spiritual inner voice that speaks to you telling you what is right, then take refuge in the scriptures and the wise.)

Technically speaking therefore, in the saint’s story, ‘yes he is in the hut’ was the lie. So the ‘truth’ that he spoke in the literal sense turned out to be a lie. In contrast, faithful to his higher calling as being a living spark of God, the truth would have been that answer which would be Godly. Since ‘No’ would have stopped the needless murder; that was the answer heaven was seeking.

The purpose is important. The Quote from Sherlock Holmes indicates this. If one is endowed with talents and skills, it must be put to use for a higher purpose/duty (detective work) rather than for self-aggrandizing (that too thieving). Putting it positively, as the modern-day sage Sirshree Tejparkhi says, one must have ‘impersonal’ goals.

Getting habituated to dishonesty:

Another aspect of dishonesty is about expertise in it. It is about ‘habituated’ dishonesty. This gets validated in another scientific study which another student shared.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nn.4426

In this paper titled “The brain adapts to dishonesty” (that appeared in Nature Neuroscience volume 19, 24 October 2016) the authors Neil Garrett, Stephanie C Lazzaro, Dan Ariely & Tali Sharot provide empirical evidence for a gradual escalation of self-serving dishonesty and reveal a neural mechanism supporting it. Behaviorally, they show that the extent to which participants engage in self-serving dishonesty increases with repetition. Their findings, therefore, uncovers a biological mechanism that supports a ‘slippery slope’: what begins as small acts of dishonesty can escalate into larger transgressions.

This does somewhat resonate with the original passage that people who cannot be trusted in small things cannot be trusted in big things as well.  And added to that there is this operational word that carries significance—self-serving. This ought to be one of the indices that separates God from Mammon. And as one gets increasingly self-serving he should be getting comfortable in the service of Mammon.

Impact of dishonesty:

Impact-wise too it is clear that dishonesty as a policy ultimately leaves those that practice it for the poorer. Yet another share of a research finding by the same student shows this:

https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/09/29/is-honesty-for-suckers/dishonesty-only-provides-short-term-benefits

Dan Ariely is the James B Duke professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University and the co-producer of “Dishonesty: The Truth About Lies.” He writes that when an individual or a company acts dishonestly, they pollute the trust pool — they erode the social trust we have in one another — and we are all worse for it.

It is probably the breach of the ‘agreement’ or ‘promise’ that contributes to this, and that breach makes team work and mutual reliability very difficult. Or rather, teams and relationships suffer.

As for the trait of leadership, when the so-called leader’s words cannot be accepted for face value, then even the most ardent follower will harbor a degree of skepticism. This kind of leader would have to wield authority through coercion and transaction rather than inspiration. Would such a person be believed when he talks about intangible matters of the spirit? Further, given that leadership (the transformation kind) is exerted through truth and spirit, the person who is habituated to dishonesty is unlikely to be a beckon light for excellence and positive change.

In conclusion:

The true test for honesty is at the spiritual level. The categorical imperative is about being faithful to the spirit and the wise—without fail. The choice is between self-seeking and impersonal, between mediocre and excellence, and between being listless and inspired. In this characteristic, honesty is not about shades of grey but about the extremes of black and white. Shades of grey come into question when what is defined as truth/lie is taken too literally without reference to the spirit. The greys can be resolved if one considers the four square matrix with earthly right and wrong and spiritual right and wrong being the two axes.

The force of the spirit and the words of the wise decide the contents of dharma. To act in commitment to that Dharma is the call of honesty. One who is habituated to dishonesty is likely to confuse himself too, and prone to failure in tackling issues of Dharma.

Some observations which the students made in their write-ups:

1) Life is based on responsibility, belief, trust and honesty. Cheating can become an innate habit. This is something to be really thought of. There is a thin line of difference between trust and belief. Trust is involuntary belief. A cheat or an unethical person loses it all in a jiffy. Cheating on small things can lead to undesirable outcomes in the long run….

He has kind of summarized the ill effects of being dishonest.

2) …There are chances that such acts could proliferate into personal life as well. Once the near and dear ones start to notice that the person is deceiving them, the disaster sets in. This leads to imbalance in life, which is totally unnecessary. A fiasco can be prevented in the first go… “

The malignancy of dishonesty…

3) Some students felt that that the statement was an opinion and not an empirical fact.

This has to be proven either way of course. More importantly, each man for himself. I have studied this for some time and am reasonably sure it is an empirical fact…

4) …just because they were dishonest in something you cannot brand them as such… take the example of Starbucks company which hired felons and succeeded as a company. The point is that given a second chance people can change.

Fair enough. This observation though brings into focus anther related dimension. As Jesus Christ puts it “No one but God is Good” (no man should be called good) and by corollary, ‘no one but the devil is bad’. The point is that one must not take a judgmental attitude about felons. Neither a criminal, nor a dishonest person must be judged. Honesty is about an attitude. People who have a dishonest attitude carry the attitude forward as a way to live. They show the same attitude in things big or small, in things earthly or heavenly… it will manifest in their cognitive and emotional dimensions as they go about life… The point being that the discussion about honesty is about understanding the attitude and inclinations of a person. This matters in the NOW and it is.should be not about judging him for the dishonesties of the past.

5) One student said “There are degrees to honesty and one can be dishonest in things that are not important but honest in things that are important.” In a similar vein one other student said that “one can be relatively honest when dealing with important people and in relations that matter.”

This of course must be decided case to case. If the purpose of each act is not self-serving. If the ‘other’ (the whole world) is loved as one loves himself; and if one’s action is in consonance with this belief, then there is no issue.

6) Another student also pointed out that it is not wrong to be dishonest if the purpose is not selfish and you are helping others even if in an exam hall.

Still another student was more detailed but more or less said a similar thing:

My own friends who may have been better than everyone else in other aspects were sent out of college as they did not score enough marks. So if anyone is ready to help them not go through the embarrassment of leaving a post-graduate college because of marks, I don’t see any harm done. If the system tries to build us on our individual strengths at this level of education rather than marks, then maybe dishonesty in many aspects can be avoided. 

It is partially true that if one is helping it is selfless. It is sacrificial even because one takes up the risk of getting caught doing an illegal act of helping in the exams. But then is it not selfish of the person who is receiving help? And even if the person who is helping, is it not selfish of the person that HIS friend receives help to the disadvantage of those that are NOT his friends? And most of all, if the friend is going to be a doctor, would he in due course get his family members treated by that friend? The Categorical imperative for ‘Dharma’ asks for loyalty to the system designed by the wise. In our case, if we have pledged allegiance to the existing education system then honesty would lie in ensuring that the education system attains the aim of creation and transmission of knowledge through systems established in excellence. How does helping someone else in an exam enhance excellence? And yet again “Not helping anyone in exams” is not the categorical imperative one must attach himself to.

Incidentally “Dharma” is central to the Indian ethos. The only purpose that Lord Krishna had in this world was to establish “Dharma”. Another of the important avatars of the Highest power, Lord Rama, is remembered as ‘mariyadapurushottam’ (respectable-man-ideal) because of his upholding Dharma. Dharma is supposed to be the ‘highest benefactor’ according to a renowned saint-scholar Adi Shankara. The closest equivalent to this term “Dharma” in modern parlance is rule-of-law. If it is upheld, everyone gets benefitted. So “Dharma” Vs ‘copying’ … what should be the choice for the student?

7) If you are interested in wellbeing then honesty is all ok… but what if you want to succeed and live a happy life….?

This claim does not seem right as research seems to point the other way. In fact, Dan Ariely’s article is titled ‘Dishonesty only provides short-term benefits’. When dishonesty is used as a guiding principle in the pursuit of success does not carry one far. Neither does it bring out the best from one’s team. That is what Dan Ariely has found.

The scriptures suggest that the precursor to happiness is peace and success is more a consequence of it. Would success wrought from dishonesty lead to peace and happiness? Success at dishonesty is contested by the simple axiom that “You can fool all the people for some time. You can fool some people all the time. But you cannot fool all the people all the time.” As one’s reputation of dishonesty grows, where would it lead to?

8) It is ok as long as you don’t hurt the others’ feelings. Nothing wrong in dishonesty in small things that achieves much greater good that one wants to achieve. I may not be very good at academics, but I know that I am very good at work. In order to reach that place (of work/job) I need to run this race and that is what my country and my society demand.

Would a ‘Dharmic’ country and society demand that? If the peers are demanding that then the adage ‘man is judged by the company he keeps’ comes into play.

9) A dishonest person can be a good leader because he has seen the worst now…

I would guess that is a wrong belief. They could probably have expertise in tactics and become expert transactional managers. But the genuine inspiring leaders who build great teams are known to have integrity and honesty.

10) …how important honesty is depends all in the age cycle one is presently in. A person ageing more than 35+ will have a different opinion compared to someone who is in his early 20’s.

I guess it is not about age, rather it is about the lessons one has learnt in his life up to that point in time. Some lessons are taught, some lessons come through traditions, some are learnt through experience, still other minds selectively count proof to buttress their favorite hypothesis. But ultimately what they believe will shape their actions. It is how your belief shapes up as you age—not the age itself…

11) …as trust isn’t build or broken on one instance, trust takes time to develop. So it all comes down to, where you are being dishonest. For a friend to be dishonest, that is something that comes with the package. Sure there may certain lines drawn, but it all depends on the strong bond you used to have.

Indeed it is good to forgive. The past records; that should not be used to judge and grudge. But it is also evidence of how one is likely to act in the present and in the future. If someone has not gone abysmally down the ‘slippery slope’ then a good friend would be aware, due to their mutual acquaintance, as to how much the other can be relied upon.

Another student writes: For example, say I have this really close friend, very close that I can call this person a best friend. Given this scenario, I trust this friend of mine and expect him/her to behave in a certain manner.

Best friend, indeed, can be forgiven too but then what one needs to be aware is that dishonesty is a habit, an attitude, as long as one can adjust and accept that, it should be fine.

12) Cheating on small things can lead to undesirable outcomes in the long run. The mind can get attuned to counterfeiting or hoaxing

Indeed that is what the scientific evidence also suggests (Neil Garret et all).

13) … deceiving by silence could be on par with or worse than actually lying.

Indeed both action and inaction, when tested on the categorical imperative of ‘Dharma’, would decide what would be right and what would not.

14) Honesty is the more sought out character trait in many. Whether it is a spouse, business partner or anyone, we do expect them to be honest. At times, however, a strong sense of integrity can be a significant impediment to spiritual growth, and the cause of one’s undoing.

The former part of the statement seems fine enough but as for the latter part one needs to actually study this instance to see what was right or what went wrong. If integrity binds one to the right in the material plane while being wrong in the spiritual one then this can happen. Similarly if one is right in the spiritual plane and wrong in the material, and if that person goes along the spiritual right, then it can be seen as a ‘cause of one’s undoing’ (as the student mentions), but it is also a question of priority. Some spiritual practitioners generally refer to this dilemma as choosing between the easy wrong path or the difficult right path.

15) People cheat for the same reason that they do things like text and drive, jump the signal or break traffic rules – even though people know that they (such acts) are not good for them in the long-term, they do these things because they tend to forget about the long-term repercussions and think only on the short-term benefits. At the end of the day, being dishonest can be a good approach for someone who is just trying to maximize short-term profits.

Kind of true, yes, sometimes dishonesty can maximize short-term benefits. Yet it is best avoided as long-term the loss is very significant. As for indulging in ill-legal acts, like for instance breaking the signal, there is some advice from the ancient wise men. The ascendency is as follows: Practice, tradition, law and finally Dharma. The law is what has been agreed upon as a nation. But the law itself emerges from a humanist principle. We all sit together and think what is correct and come up with the law. The motivation that drives the search for the best law comes from the ‘Dharma’ impulse. So again the pursuit of honesty would want one to refer back to dharma and see whether the breach of law is admissible. However, an illegal act will draw due punishment as per the law applicable at that place and time.

16) Law is made by the people. It is for the good of the people. A substance illegal in a state may not be in another. Likewise, an act illegal in this time frame may not be in another. You never know.

Absolutely, it is how each legislative assembly perceives what is humanly right at that time and age for the area over which it exerts dominion. So one must follow the law when one is in the nation where that law holds. But then as discussed above, the Dharma impulse overrides. To, therefore, be able to read the dictates of the ‘Supreme Self’ is the challenge confronting each of us.

17) Many a time, people tend to cheat because of the surrounding ambiance as well. Peer pressure and the pressure to ensure that they don’t end up at the bottom of the pack, (make) people cheat. When they cheat they have social acceptance as well because in this fast-paced world honest people are no longer valued as they were before. It is a very sad but true fact.

Yes, that is correct. But the test of true character is to keep one’s integrity regardless. “One” can make a difference. To follow the wise or to follow the crowd, one must take a call…

18) A person could be dishonest in small things but could do things quite well when it comes to bigger things. Maybe he is forced into certain situation/event. You cannot brand him for one-off instance. Rather, someone who is dishonest very frequently is the kind of guy you cannot trust. I have seen many people who have been dishonest very frequently. I know they cannot be trusted. You don’t need empirical evidence for that. They boast stories of being dishonest and how they have gained so much from it. The kind of impression they make in your life is very bad. The boasting just tarnishes the image of the said person because you know even though they will reach somewhere, there won’t be many people around him that he can trust. They cannot be genuine leaders but they will get what they want.

The student has given a good contrast between someone who is basically honest and another who is dishonest. He also has captured the dilemma of encountering a person whose attitude is basically dishonest. But as discussed earlier, research seems to point out that the gains of dishonesty, if at all, are temporary. In some situations, they would get away with what they want. But would they be effective in leadership and in relationships? It is doubtful. And then again whether it is just one indiscretion or habitual dishonesty, one must not condemn judgmentally. Just beware of the attitude.

19) There is this movie in Malayalam called “Thondimuthalum Dhiksaahiyum”. In the movie, the lead actor is passionate about the art of stealing and he is very addicted to it. If that happens then you can’t do anything about it.

It is a script writer’s imagination, a movie director’s perspective on life. It could surely be based on a real case of a similar kind. The real case is the one that must be studied. And one may come up with interesting finds about what is causing the behavior.

19) This quote reminds me of ‘Servant Leadership’. There is a big difference between Traditional Leadership and Servant Leadership. Traditional Leadership involves the accumulation and exercise of power one at the “top of the pyramid”. There is no place of compassion and morality in doing any business in Traditional Leadership. For example: – When we talk about politics, there is an element of dishonesty in almost all the politicians and appointed politicians. And those who claim to be honest, if you do a complete audit I am sure most of the other senators would be found guilty of “cooking their books”. Unfortunately, still we appoint these dishonest politicians and these people run the country. Similarly, there is no sense of morality when you run a big business…….

Kalyug!!! So what are you going to do to make a difference? Do you believe in the power of one? Will you fight on the side of Lord Krishna/the wise?

20) …. I believe organizations as well as individuals could be servant-leaders. Indeed, I have a great faith that servant-leader organizations could change the world

Yes we can!!!

 

Article by Nixon Fernando

Faculty, Great Lakes Institute of Management, Manamai Chennai.

With inputs from Peter, Sandeep, Jijo, Adithya, Sruthi, Deepika, Sri Ranjani, Priyankha, Naveen and Anmol; All students of Great Lakes

Will Zimbabwe turn into another Egypt?

Annihilating around 300 Egyptians, the recent attack at Al-Rawda mosque in Sinai Peninsula has been one of the worst destruction in Egyptian history. Though no one claimed responsibility, the government suspects that Islamic State (IS) affiliate – Sinai Province group is behind the insurgency. Causalities are followers of Sufism, which is perceived as anti-Islam by few Sunni organisations. The reasons for the attack are both religious, political and strategic. The incident will remain as a black mark in the books of Egyptian history.

The attack was carried out by IS, which is a Sunni organisation, on the followers of Sufism. Egyptian society is mostly populated by Muslim Brotherhood which is also an affiliate of Sunni tradition. So, the Sunnis, who are intolerant to Sufism are mostly responsible for the attack. The reason for Muslim Brotherhood’s (Sunnis) angst against Egyptian Armed Forces is lack of their representation. For the first time in history, Muslim Brotherhood got representation in the form of Mohammad Morsi, President of Egypt from 2011 to 2013. But, in a military coup followed by elections, present President Abdel Fatah el-Sisi replaced Mohammad Morsi. Autocratic rule of el-Sisi led to resurgence of IS in Sinai Peninsula.

Sinai Peninsula is strategically located between Egypt and Israel. The organisation controlling this peninsula gains privilege to control Suez Canal, one of the trade hotspots of the world. Suez Canal connect Red sea with Mediterranean Sea reducing the efforts of the ships to travel across Africa. So, Adbul Fatah el-Sisi after assuming office in 2014, launched numerous attacks on militants in northern Sinai Peninsula. Insurgents also retaliated strongly in all the occasions. Recent attack on the mosque is one among them. The insurgents brutally attacked the ambulances which were present to rescue the victims, exemplifying their cold blooded nature and the crisis in northern peninsula. Egyptian government should crackdown the militant operations and also simultaneously provide representation to Muslim Brotherhood in the top leadership.

Further South to Egypt, another African nation is presently in crisis. Zimbabwe’s Vice President, Emmerson Mnangagwa, overthrew President Robert Mugabe with the help of military and assumed office. Tough, Mr. Mnangagwa has huge public support, a large minority of the population still supports Mr. Mugabe. If the present government fails to embrace all the sections of the society, the story of Egypt may repeat. For the disenchantment always turned into disastrous revolutions. From French Revolution in 1789 to Zimbabwe crisis in 2017, history is the silent

Zimbabwe Crisis

The hunger for power never wither away with time, but will simmer to take its worst form. At the age of 93 and after ruling Zimbabwe for 37 years, Robert Mugabe is in no mood to quit his Presidency. Hailed as an anti-colonist ruler by Zimbabweans, he is hated by the West for his economic policies. Recently, he fired his Vice President, Emmerson Mnangagwa, who was direct competition to his wife for succeeding him. Now, ascertaining the disenchantment of the countrymen, military commanders have occupied the entire Presidential palace and seized the city of Harare. However, they denied making any coup in the palace explaining that the present act was just to clean the political system.

After assuming the power in 1980, when Zimbabwe attained freedom, Robert Mugabe left no stone unturned to stay in power. There were accusations of murder, massacre and purge directly on him. He leveraged the ethnic conflicts between Shona and Ndebele to hold on to his power. Being a Shona, Mr.Mugabe was also accused of being involved in Gukurahundi massacre wherein hundreds of Ndebeles were killed. He completely purged all his rivals out of the political party. Even Hitler followed a similar policy when he took over Germany in late 1920s. It created economic turmoil back then in Germany and right now, in Zimbabwe due to the hegemony of these individuals.

During his Presidency, Zimbabwe was also subjected to a worst economic crisis in the late 2000s. Involvement in Second Congo war, underreporting of spending on military and untoward corruption resulted in hyperinflation. The currency was unscrupulously printed and circulated in the economy. By 2015, Zimbabwe adopted US dollars as its official currency as the situation was out of its hand. Thus, Mugabe rendered its economy uncompetitive in the global world. He could neither maintain the social harmony nor economic stability of his country. Till certain point, Zimbabweans believed in his nationalistic rhetoric, but now someone had to control him and his wife.

After getting hitched to Mrs. Grace Mugabe in 1996, his atrocities became more discernable. She is known for her shopping spree and extravagant spending. There were also allegations of assault on her. She could easily escape the punishment given her ability to abuse power. Now that the term of Mr. Mugabe is coming to an end, the competition to replace him is intensifying. Vice President, Emmerson Mnangagwa, is the next power center who could wield equivalent power in the country as that of Mr. Mugabe. Underestimating his power, Mr. Mugabe fired him from the post expecting to clear the way for his wife. But, the game has turned against him and the repercussions are yet to be seen.

Landslide Victory of Shinzo Abe – What’s In Store For India !

1400 years of irrevocable relationship has been strengthened with the re-election of Shinzo Abe as Japanese Prime Minister. His election not only strengthens Japanese economy but also significantly contributes to global political and economic stability. His assertion against North Korea acts and his concern towards aging people of Japan has provided a landslide victory to Abe. Also, with China reasserting itself as the power centre in Asia, Abe’s victory will soothe Japanese concerns due to his unconditional support to security issues.

While all the global economies are preparing to absorb the anticipated Fed’s interest rates hike, Abe’s election pacifies their anxiety. Abe promised to continue to retain the lower interest rates to boost the economy. This would imbibe lower capital into the global markets while the money may move towards U.S.A after Fed’s interest rate hike. India would be a major beneficiary as many projects in India are funded by Japanese. For example, India received capital for its bullet train project in Gujarat from Japan for a minimal interest rate. Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that the interest rates in Japan are negative which makes it a win-win situation for both the countries.

In terms of security, Japan understood the importance of strengthening its defence capabilities after the North Korea’s blatant acts. Korean missiles flew over Japanese airspace sending shivers to its citizens. Abe staunchly opposed the acts of Korea and resolved to retaliate accordingly. After the Hiroshima and Nagasaki incident, Japan was in the protection of U.S.A and never tried to build defence capabilities. It was a strong propagator of peace highlighting the dismantling of nuclear weapons. But now, with Trump focussing more on its own economy, Japan cannot rely on U.S.A for its security. It needs to develop its own army, navy and air force. Also, Japan may extend support to India’s nuclear policy, which is a bone of contention between two countries since our independence.

With U.S.A reaching out to South Asian countries with its renewed foreign policy, it’s time for India to strengthen ties with Japan. Trump’s withdrawal from Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has generated discontentment in Japan. India, along with Japan, could put pressure on U.S.A to reconsider its stand on Paris agreement and TPP. Also, Trump’s recent speech at IMF and World Bank stating that U.S.A has pumped in more money than expected into these institutions is a cause of concern for India. So, we could take help of Japan in making the USA reconsider its decision.

Catalonia in Spain and Gorkhaland in India

catalonia.png

When a region is not respected, revolution is the repercussion. Catalonia in Spain and Gorkhaland in India have intensified their assertion for a greater autonomy. The underlying issue behind these protests is the discontentment generated due to the subjugation of their regional aspirations by the corresponding governments. Though the displeasure in both the regions was simmering through many decades, the immediate cause was the negligence of their language by their governments. Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal imposed Bengali as the compulsory language in the Gorkhaland. Similarly, Spain never respected the Catalan language. So, the protests were imminent and led to political unrest in the region. As of now, peace is established in Gorkhaland but the war is just about to begin in Catalonia.

The present-day Catalonia is on the border of Spain and France. Through ages, it has its own culture and identity. By 1715, Spain was able to subjugate Catalonian provinces and brought the entire islands under its control. Till 1938, Catalonia was granted greater autonomy and it was able to protect its traditions. However, in that particular year, General Francisco Franco destroyed Catalonian nationalism with a deadly war which consumed 3,500 lives. Since then, Catalonian people tried to gain more independence through various protests. But, the drastic step taken by Catalan leader this September, led to present crises. Carles Puigdemont brought in a resolution in Catalonia urging for its complete independence. 90% of the participants voted for independence but only 43% of voters participated in the elections conducted.

This was not in line with the agreement between Spain and Catalonia. So, Spain had to take a drastic measure of imposing Article 155 of Spanish constitution which brings Catalonia’s governance under Spain’s control. In response to which Catalonia lawmakers passed a resolution demanding complete independence. Now that the Catalonia has taken the extreme step, Spain is left with no other choice but to impose direct rule. Further action by both the governments is yet to be seen. Political parties such as Catalan European Democratic Party are adamant are not accepting anything short of complete independence. Spain on the other hand, cannot lose Barcelona, present in Catalonia, which contributes to 20% of its GDP. The situation is nowhere near peace and it will just add the fuel to the already burning European crisis in the form of Brexit.

In India, Gorkha Janmukti Morcha is demanding for the creation of Gorkhaland. They needed a separate identity for themselves. They also feel that Bengal is slowly intriguing into the affairs of its administration. Gorkhaland, similar to Catalonia has got autonomous powers to create their own rules in the form of Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA). However, both the Catalonian administration and Gorkhaland administration has to abide by their nation’s constitution. Few fringe elements in Gorkhaland used artillery to demand their independence which cannot be tolerated by India. Similarly, Catalonia went ahead and passed the resolution which is contravening with Spain’s constitution. So, it has to ready to face the backlash from the Spain’s government. If India were to take a stand, we would definitely support Spain, as we have Kashmir sitting right above our head.

Swimming – Needs to be learned not mandated

swim (1)

As an Indian who has studied in a CBSE school, I was taught that Mawsynram and Cherrapunji are among the wettest places on planet earth. But as of late, there are many unexpected places that are receiving higher rainfall above the mean values. The Climate Change phenomenon is taking shape at a new level altogether. The expected increase in temperature is about 8-10 degrees for a century. The increase in temperature would cause the icebergs and the ice on top of the peaks of mountains to melt. This would in turn lead to an increased level of water in the rivers and would increase the level of water bodies on earth. As the water level rises, the coastal regions are more prone to be invaded by the inanimate force of the water leading to floods and high inland tides, making it virtually inhabitable.

On the other hand, the recent rains in Bangalore are a great example of how life gets disrupted due to rain. The rain lashed for days together and flooded the city. The rains have uprooted almost a thousand trees. Is this an effect because of the cutting of trees in the first place? Or is it because of some other reason such as construction activities after the uprooting of trees?

The water retention capacity of soil goes down because of the absence of roots of trees, which on the other hand absorb the water and act as an impetus to the gushing flow of water. Apart from the nature’s brute force, the outbreak of epidemics permeates during the rainy seasons. The arrangement of the clogged water is apt for mosquitos and its other cousins to breed. The number of deaths due to Dengue, Malaria and other diseases are generally high during this period.

Rains are not bad. But excessive rains are ones to combat especially in places like Bangalore, Chennai and Mumbai. Majorly, all three places should have contingency plans to reduce the losses. The approximate loss during the infamous Chennai floods was anywhere between 2 billion dollars to 2.3 billion dollars (Depending on various sources). Government could actually allow the builders or collaborate with them to build a few townships right outside the cities so that, the relocating is easier during mishaps. The saving of lives is the prima donna during such events. Thus, we must do our best in preventing a scenario where swimming would be a mode of travel to office along with boats and jet skis!! Some momentum in the fiscal spending can also be generated in addition to the infrastructural growth and contingency measures. Providing insurance is only a short term measure and has proved to be a short term cure. Hence, more prominent action needs to be stepped up to build a more resilient economy.

Some real heroes/heroines of India – Part- 2

hero2.png

Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw

One of the most enterprising persona of India in the recent past. She is the founder of one of the largest 35 billion INR Bio-Pharmaceutical Company in India called “Biocon”. Her company has made many acquisitions, thus transforming a small company into a billion INR one. She studied in Bangalore University and IIM-B. Her quotes are regarded to be inquisitive and thought provoking. She does not prefer to use the term philanthropy as she believes that a long term solution is needed instead of a short term improvement. She is also a recipient of Padmashri and Padma Bhushan from Indian government. According to her, the so called “philanthropist acts” should have sustainability and innovating is the name of the game. Apart from philanthropy, she is also in board of many top notch institutions and companies. She is one of the most inspiring personality for every Indian aspiring to carve a niche in the global arena. Every Indian needs to be aware of such eminent entrepreneurs, especially when the country is!

Meghnad Desai

He is a British Indian economist. He serves UK Parliament and is a labor’s politician. He is awarded the Padma Bhushan by the Government of India. He is an astounding economist. He is the founder of Meghnad Desai Academy of Economics, Mumbai. He gives his opinions in the majority of the prime time news shows. His works are revered across the world and his books provide a path breaking thinking approach towards solving worldly economic issues. He is probably one such individual about whom very less is known.

Yamini Krishnamurthy

A vast part of India is interested in Arts and Dance. One of the prominent dancers in India who changed the traditional dance form into something more stunning and wonderful was Yamini Krishnamurthy. She is regarded to be one of the most profound dancers India has ever seen. She is known for her sublime expressions. She gave her first performance in the 1960s. She is known to have taken Kuchipudi dance form, which is an indigenous dance of Andhra region to a global arena when the knowledge about Kuchipudi was not widely prevalent. She had the privilege to learn Bharatnatyam from one of the “Dance Mozarts” of 20th century, Rukmini Devi Arundale. Amongst all the dancers and the aspiring artists, she is one to look forward while embarking on the art journey.

Article Originally written by Adithya N

Nobel Prizes 2017

As it happens every year, this year’s Nobel prize did not disappoint anyone. Breakthrough researches in different fields were recognized and the prizes were awarded accordingly. Each noble laureate would receive a gold medal, a diploma and a sum of money as decided by the foundation.

The Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Rainer Weiss, Barry. C. Barish and Kip. S. Thorne for the detection of gravitational waves. Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) was used to detect these waves. The detected gravitational waves were generated when black holes merged with each other creating a space time distortion. This also proves Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity.

Next, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank and Richard Henderson for developing cryo-electron microscopy. The high resolution microscope is used to determine the structure of bio molecules. It will also facilitate the observation of bio-molecules by freezing them mid-movement. This 3 dimensional view of atomic particles was the result of series of discoveries by these laureates. First a protein was viewed 3 dimensionally, later the electron microscope was used to merge two 2 dimensional objects to generate 3 dimensional view. Finally, water was added to microscope’s vacuum to evaporate and collapse bio molecules making them to freeze.

Later, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Jeffery. C. Hall, Michael Rosbash and Michael. W. young. They discovered the “molecular mechanisms controlling the circadian rhythm.” For many years, we knew that our body adopts to the regular rhythm of the day. The nobel laureates identified the gene responsible for biological clock and isolated a specific protein responsible for it. Also, they proved the after effects of not adopting to the cycle. Jet lag, alzheimer’s disease are few such cases.

Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to Kazuo Ishiguro “who, in novels of great emotional force, has uncovered the abyss beneath our illusory sense of connection with the world.” Being a British writer of Japanese origin he could provide a unique perspective of Japan. His much famed books describe the way in which Japan was devastated during World War 2 and how it was built thereafter. With his words he could evoke emotional appeal among the audience for which he earned the nobel prize.

While North Korea and U.S.A are threatening each other with the usage of nuclear weapons, the Nobel Foundation was rightly decided to award Nobel Peace Prize to the organisation-International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). It was instrumental in achieving treaty based prohibition of these weapons. The organization also works to highlight the loss and humanitarian destruction caused due to the usage of such weapons.

Lastly, the Nobel Prize in Economics is awarded to Richard. H. Thaler for is work on Behavioural Economics. He proved that factors such as limited rationality, lack of self-control and social preferences affect the consumer behaviour. Essentially he bridged the gap between psychology and economics. Thus, paying way for new field of study.

One important observation about this year Nobel Prize is that there no women in the list. Yet again raises many unanswerable questions!